Background:

In August 2021, during the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan, Josie Stewart, a civil servant at the FCDO, became aware of internal decisions prioritising the evacuation of animals over human lives. Disturbed by these actions, she leaked information to the BBC, aiming to shed light on the government’s controversial choices.

Afterwards, Stewart faced disciplinary actions, including the revocation of her security clearance, leading to her dismissal.

---

Allegations

• Unfair dismissal in retaliation for whistleblowing

---

Tribunal Findings:

In February 2025, the employment tribunal ruled in Stewart’s favour, stating that her dismissal was unjust and recognising her disclosures as being in the public interest. The tribunal emphasised the importance of whistleblower protections, especially when the disclosed information pertains to significant public concerns. This case highlights the tension between government confidentiality and the public’s right to transparency, reinforcing the importance of whistleblower protections under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998.

---

HR Takeaways:

Ethical considerations and employee protections play a vital role in the workplace and this case serves as a strong reminder of their importance.

We all know and understand that whistleblowing policies are more than a legal requirement. Employees need confidence that raising concerns will not lead to repercussions. This starts with a clear, accessible policy that outlines reporting procedures, protections, and zero tolerance for retaliation.

A policy alone however is not enough. Regular training ensures employees understand their rights and feel equipped to report concerns appropriately. And yes, WE know. Another mandatory training session may not spark joy but it is still preferable to dealing with the aftermath of a scandal.

Confidentiality is also crucial. Whistleblowers must trust that their identity will be protected, with dedicated support in place throughout the process.

Beyond individual cases, employers also need a robust and impartial investigation process. Concerns should be addressed promptly and fairly, not dismissed with a vague promise to “look into it.”